From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 3/8] gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:11:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221018001202.2732458-3-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018001202.2732458-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 670f8ce56dd0632dc29a0322e188cc73ce3c6b92 ]
Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very
unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it
should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to
bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so
we can just check that it's the expected value.
Tested with:
mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb
for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do
gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb
mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test && umount /mnt/test
done
Before this patch we get a withdraw after
[ 76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block
[ 76.413681] bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4)
[ 76.413681] function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492
and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like
[ 76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19
[ 76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately
and we get an explanation in dmesg.
Reported-by: syzbot+dcf33a7aae997956fe06 at syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
index 0e6fa91f4c8f..55daf740ab8d 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ static int gfs2_check_sb(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int silent)
pr_warn("Invalid superblock size\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
-
+ if (sb->sb_bsize_shift != ffs(sb->sb_bsize) - 1) {
+ pr_warn("Invalid block size shift\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.35.1
parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20221018001202.2732458-1-sashal@kernel.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221018001202.2732458-3-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).