From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 12/18] fs: dlm: allow different allocation context per _create_message
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:45:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221027204528.1119036-12-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221027204528.1119036-1-aahringo@redhat.com>
This patch allows to give the use control about the allocation context
based on a per message basis. Currently all messages forced to be
created under GFP_NOFS context.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/lock.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
fs/dlm/memory.c | 4 ++--
fs/dlm/memory.h | 2 +-
fs/dlm/midcomms.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index f4b2fb17bbb1..a2930e33c134 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -3554,7 +3554,8 @@ int dlm_unlock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace,
static int _create_message(struct dlm_ls *ls, int mb_len,
int to_nodeid, int mstype,
struct dlm_message **ms_ret,
- struct dlm_mhandle **mh_ret)
+ struct dlm_mhandle **mh_ret,
+ gfp_t allocation)
{
struct dlm_message *ms;
struct dlm_mhandle *mh;
@@ -3564,7 +3565,7 @@ static int _create_message(struct dlm_ls *ls, int mb_len,
pass into midcomms_commit and a message buffer (mb) that we
write our data into */
- mh = dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(to_nodeid, mb_len, GFP_NOFS, &mb);
+ mh = dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(to_nodeid, mb_len, allocation, &mb);
if (!mh)
return -ENOBUFS;
@@ -3586,7 +3587,8 @@ static int _create_message(struct dlm_ls *ls, int mb_len,
static int create_message(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
int to_nodeid, int mstype,
struct dlm_message **ms_ret,
- struct dlm_mhandle **mh_ret)
+ struct dlm_mhandle **mh_ret,
+ gfp_t allocation)
{
int mb_len = sizeof(struct dlm_message);
@@ -3607,7 +3609,7 @@ static int create_message(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
}
return _create_message(r->res_ls, mb_len, to_nodeid, mstype,
- ms_ret, mh_ret);
+ ms_ret, mh_ret, allocation);
}
/* further lowcomms enhancements or alternate implementations may make
@@ -3676,7 +3678,7 @@ static int send_common(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
if (error)
return error;
- error = create_message(r, lkb, to_nodeid, mstype, &ms, &mh);
+ error = create_message(r, lkb, to_nodeid, mstype, &ms, &mh, GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
goto fail;
@@ -3737,7 +3739,8 @@ static int send_grant(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
to_nodeid = lkb->lkb_nodeid;
- error = create_message(r, lkb, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_GRANT, &ms, &mh);
+ error = create_message(r, lkb, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_GRANT, &ms, &mh,
+ GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
goto out;
@@ -3758,7 +3761,8 @@ static int send_bast(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mode)
to_nodeid = lkb->lkb_nodeid;
- error = create_message(r, NULL, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_BAST, &ms, &mh);
+ error = create_message(r, NULL, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_BAST, &ms, &mh,
+ GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
goto out;
@@ -3783,7 +3787,8 @@ static int send_lookup(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
if (error)
return error;
- error = create_message(r, NULL, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP, &ms, &mh);
+ error = create_message(r, NULL, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP, &ms, &mh,
+ GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
goto fail;
@@ -3807,7 +3812,8 @@ static int send_remove(struct dlm_rsb *r)
to_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(r);
- error = create_message(r, NULL, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_REMOVE, &ms, &mh);
+ error = create_message(r, NULL, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_REMOVE, &ms, &mh,
+ GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
goto out;
@@ -3828,7 +3834,7 @@ static int send_common_reply(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
to_nodeid = lkb->lkb_nodeid;
- error = create_message(r, lkb, to_nodeid, mstype, &ms, &mh);
+ error = create_message(r, lkb, to_nodeid, mstype, &ms, &mh, GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
goto out;
@@ -3869,7 +3875,8 @@ static int send_lookup_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms_in,
struct dlm_mhandle *mh;
int error, nodeid = le32_to_cpu(ms_in->m_header.h_nodeid);
- error = create_message(r, NULL, nodeid, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY, &ms, &mh);
+ error = create_message(r, NULL, nodeid, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY, &ms, &mh,
+ GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
goto out;
@@ -6295,7 +6302,7 @@ static int send_purge(struct dlm_ls *ls, int nodeid, int pid)
int error;
error = _create_message(ls, sizeof(struct dlm_message), nodeid,
- DLM_MSG_PURGE, &ms, &mh);
+ DLM_MSG_PURGE, &ms, &mh, GFP_NOFS);
if (error)
return error;
ms->m_nodeid = cpu_to_le32(nodeid);
diff --git a/fs/dlm/memory.c b/fs/dlm/memory.c
index 61fe0d1f5646..eb7a08641fcf 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/memory.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/memory.c
@@ -134,9 +134,9 @@ void dlm_free_lkb(struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
kmem_cache_free(lkb_cache, lkb);
}
-struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_allocate_mhandle(void)
+struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_allocate_mhandle(gfp_t allocation)
{
- return kmem_cache_alloc(mhandle_cache, GFP_NOFS);
+ return kmem_cache_alloc(mhandle_cache, allocation);
}
void dlm_free_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mhandle)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/memory.h b/fs/dlm/memory.h
index c1583ec8b2cf..6b29563d24f7 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/memory.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/memory.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct dlm_lkb *dlm_allocate_lkb(struct dlm_ls *ls);
void dlm_free_lkb(struct dlm_lkb *l);
char *dlm_allocate_lvb(struct dlm_ls *ls);
void dlm_free_lvb(char *l);
-struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_allocate_mhandle(void);
+struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_allocate_mhandle(gfp_t allocation);
void dlm_free_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mhandle);
struct writequeue_entry *dlm_allocate_writequeue(void);
void dlm_free_writequeue(struct writequeue_entry *writequeue);
diff --git a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
index e10a6e97df44..3a4e20d6cd2d 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(int nodeid, int len,
/* this is a bug, however we going on and hope it will be resolved */
WARN_ON(test_bit(DLM_NODE_FLAG_STOP_TX, &node->flags));
- mh = dlm_allocate_mhandle();
+ mh = dlm_allocate_mhandle(allocation);
if (!mh)
goto err;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 20:45 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 01/18] fs: dlm: fix sock release if listen fails Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 02/18] fs: dlm: retry accept() until -EAGAIN or error returns Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 03/18] fs: dlm: remove send repeat remove handling Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 04/18] fs: dlm: use packet in dlm_mhandle Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 05/18] fd: dlm: trace send/recv of dlm message and rcom Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 06/18] fs: dlm: let dlm_add_cb queue work after resume only Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 07/18] fs: dlm: use list_first_entry marco Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 08/18] fs: dlm: convert ls_cb_mutex mutex to spinlock Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 09/18] fs: dlm: use spin lock instead of mutex Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 10/18] fs: dlm: move last cast bast time to function call Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 11/18] fs: dlm: use a non-static queue for callbacks Alexander Aring
2022-10-28 21:17 ` Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 13/18] fs: dlm: remove ls_remove_wait waitqueue Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 14/18] fs: dlm: relax sending to allow receiving Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 15/18] fs: dlm: catch dlm_add_member() error Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 16/18] fs: dlm: fix log of lowcomms vs midcomms Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 17/18] fs: dlm: use WARN_ON_ONCE() instead of WARN_ON() Alexander Aring
2022-10-27 20:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6.1-rc1 18/18] fs: dlm: rework lowcomms handling Alexander Aring
2022-10-28 21:25 ` Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221027204528.1119036-12-aahringo@redhat.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).