From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 6/7] iomap/xfs: Eliminate the iomap_valid handler
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:06:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221216150626.670312-7-agruenba@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221216150626.670312-1-agruenba@redhat.com>
Eliminate the ->iomap_valid() handler by switching to a ->page_prepare()
handler and validating the mapping there.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 24 ++++--------------------
fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/iomap.h | 17 -----------------
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 6b7c1a10b8ec..b73ff317da21 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
const struct iomap_page_ops *page_ops = iter->iomap.page_ops;
const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
struct folio *folio;
- int status = 0;
+ int status;
BUG_ON(pos + len > iter->iomap.offset + iter->iomap.length);
if (srcmap != &iter->iomap)
@@ -642,27 +642,11 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio)) {
if (!folio)
return (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT) ? -EAGAIN : -ENOMEM;
- return PTR_ERR(folio);
- }
-
- /*
- * Now we have a locked folio, before we do anything with it we need to
- * check that the iomap we have cached is not stale. The inode extent
- * mapping can change due to concurrent IO in flight (e.g.
- * IOMAP_UNWRITTEN state can change and memory reclaim could have
- * reclaimed a previously partially written page at this index after IO
- * completion before this write reaches this file offset) and hence we
- * could do the wrong thing here (zero a page range incorrectly or fail
- * to zero) and corrupt data.
- */
- if (page_ops && page_ops->iomap_valid) {
- bool iomap_valid = page_ops->iomap_valid(iter->inode,
- &iter->iomap);
- if (!iomap_valid) {
+ if (folio == ERR_PTR(-ESTALE)) {
iter->iomap.flags |= IOMAP_F_STALE;
- status = 0;
- goto out_unlock;
+ return 0;
}
+ return PTR_ERR(folio);
}
if (pos + len > folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio))
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index 669c1bc5c3a7..2248ce7be2e3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -62,29 +62,45 @@ xfs_iomap_inode_sequence(
return cookie | READ_ONCE(ip->i_df.if_seq);
}
-/*
- * Check that the iomap passed to us is still valid for the given offset and
- * length.
- */
-static bool
-xfs_iomap_valid(
- struct inode *inode,
- const struct iomap *iomap)
+static struct folio *
+xfs_page_prepare(
+ struct iomap_iter *iter,
+ loff_t pos,
+ unsigned len)
{
+ struct inode *inode = iter->inode;
+ struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
+ struct folio *folio;
+ folio = iomap_folio_prepare(iter, pos);
+ if (!folio)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Now we have a locked folio, before we do anything with it we need to
+ * check that the iomap we have cached is not stale. The inode extent
+ * mapping can change due to concurrent IO in flight (e.g.
+ * IOMAP_UNWRITTEN state can change and memory reclaim could have
+ * reclaimed a previously partially written page at this index after IO
+ * completion before this write reaches this file offset) and hence we
+ * could do the wrong thing here (zero a page range incorrectly or fail
+ * to zero) and corrupt data.
+ */
if (iomap->validity_cookie !=
xfs_iomap_inode_sequence(ip, iomap->flags)) {
trace_xfs_iomap_invalid(ip, iomap);
- return false;
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ folio_put(folio);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
}
XFS_ERRORTAG_DELAY(ip->i_mount, XFS_ERRTAG_WRITE_DELAY_MS);
- return true;
+ return folio;
}
const struct iomap_page_ops xfs_iomap_page_ops = {
- .iomap_valid = xfs_iomap_valid,
+ .page_prepare = xfs_page_prepare,
};
int
diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
index c74ab8c53b47..1c8b9a04b0bb 100644
--- a/include/linux/iomap.h
+++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
@@ -140,23 +140,6 @@ struct iomap_page_ops {
unsigned len);
void (*page_done)(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned copied,
struct folio *folio);
-
- /*
- * Check that the cached iomap still maps correctly to the filesystem's
- * internal extent map. FS internal extent maps can change while iomap
- * is iterating a cached iomap, so this hook allows iomap to detect that
- * the iomap needs to be refreshed during a long running write
- * operation.
- *
- * The filesystem can store internal state (e.g. a sequence number) in
- * iomap->validity_cookie when the iomap is first mapped to be able to
- * detect changes between mapping time and whenever .iomap_valid() is
- * called.
- *
- * This is called with the folio over the specified file position held
- * locked by the iomap code.
- */
- bool (*iomap_valid)(struct inode *inode, const struct iomap *iomap);
};
/*
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-16 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-16 15:06 [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 0/7] Turn iomap_page_ops into iomap_folio_ops Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-16 15:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 1/7] fs: Add folio_may_straddle_isize helper Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-23 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-23 22:04 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2022-12-16 15:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 2/7] iomap: Add iomap_folio_done helper Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-23 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-23 20:54 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2022-12-24 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-16 15:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 3/7] iomap/gfs2: Unlock and put folio in page_done handler Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-23 15:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-16 15:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 4/7] iomap: Add iomap_folio_prepare helper Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-23 15:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-23 21:05 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2022-12-24 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-25 9:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-12-28 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-16 15:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 5/7] iomap: Get page in page_prepare handler Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-16 16:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-12-16 17:15 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-23 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-16 15:06 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2022-12-23 15:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 6/7] iomap/xfs: Eliminate the iomap_valid handler Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-16 15:06 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v3 7/7] iomap: Rename page_ops to folio_ops Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 0/7] Turn iomap_page_ops into iomap_folio_ops Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 1/7] fs: Add folio_may_straddle_isize helper Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 2/7] iomap: Add iomap_folio_done helper Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 3/7] iomap/gfs2: Unlock and put folio in page_done handler Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 4/7] iomap: Add iomap_folio_prepare helper Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 5/7] iomap/gfs2: Get page in page_prepare handler Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 6/7] iomap/xfs: Eliminate the iomap_valid handler Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-12-18 22:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [RFC v4 7/7] iomap: Rename page_ops to folio_ops Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221216150626.670312-7-agruenba@redhat.com \
--to=agruenba@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).