From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:44:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 0/2] Fix regression in "Ignore
 journal	log writes for jdata holes"
In-Reply-To: <20201112145743.376789-1-rpeterso@redhat.com>
References: <20201112145743.376789-1-rpeterso@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <2023985976.25677509.1605195895739.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

----- Original Message -----
> Patch b2a846dbef4e ("gfs2: Ignore journal log writes for jdata holes"
> caused a regression. It fixed one specific problem while breaking others.
> The problem was that it changed the behavior of function gfs2_block_map
> which is used by multiple callers so it had unintended consequences for
> other callers.
> 
> This patch set reverts the patch and replaces it with a more targeted
> solution that fixes just the one case it needs to.
> 
> Bob Peterson (2):
>   Revert "gfs2: Ignore journal log writes for jdata holes"
>   gfs2: Make special version of gfs2_get_block_noalloc for jdata
> 
>  fs/gfs2/aops.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  fs/gfs2/bmap.c |  8 ++------
>  fs/gfs2/log.c  |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.26.2

NACK. Ignore this for now. Something's wrong and I'm investigating.

Regards,

Bob Peterson