From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [DLM PATCH] DLM: Don't wait for resource library lookups if NOLOOKUP is specified
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:24:37 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2091211751.3303249.1412357077147.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542C4233.1050206@redhat.com>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> I think we need to do some more investigation here... how long do the
> lookups take? If the issue is just to create a list of perferred rgrps
> for each node, then there are various ways in which we might do that.
> That is not to say that this isn't a good way to do it, but I think we
> should try to understand the timings here first and make sure that we
> are solving the right problem,
>
> Steve.
Hi,
Contrary to my previous findings (which I think I may have screwed up),
I've done further investigation and found that the DLM lookups aren't the
issue at all. Also, making the DLM master the lookup node doesn't seem to
make much difference either. So I'm scrapping this dlm patch.
My latest set of patches now includes one that evenly distributes a
preferred set of rgrps to each node. Unlike Dave's original algorithm in
GFS1, this is a round-robin scheme that makes every node "prefer" every
Nth rgrp, where N is the number of nodes. This seems to be just as fast
if not faster than messing around with DLM.
Hopefully I'll be posting more patches in the near future. I'm currently
running some more tests regarding minimum reservations, and I'll post
patches depending on those results.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-03 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <38741039.1176852.1412183985958.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2014-10-01 17:21 ` [Cluster-devel] [DLM PATCH] DLM: Don't wait for resource library lookups if NOLOOKUP is specified Bob Peterson
2014-10-01 18:04 ` Steven Whitehouse
2014-10-03 17:24 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2014-10-01 18:42 ` David Teigland
2014-10-03 17:28 ` Bob Peterson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2091211751.3303249.1412357077147.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).