From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:03:32 +0200 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 001/008] configure makefile cleanup In-Reply-To: <44A2996B.1010001@redhat.com> References: <20060628113407.B6DFA2C03C0@gordian.int.fabbione.net> <44A2996B.1010001@redhat.com> Message-ID: <44A29A44.2000207@ubuntu.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Peterson wrote: > Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> gfs and gfs-kernel do not build anylonger from HEAD. gfs-kernel requires >> dlm that's not built and gfs requires iddev that's not part of this branch >> anymore. >> >> dlm needs to build before group. The latter requires to link with dlm. >> >> enter group in distclean and add a distclean target for group/Makefile. >> >> don't configure cmirror since we do not build it (Or perhaps fix the Makefile?). >> >> gfs2 is on the way to be merged upstream. gnbd should probably do the same and >> already part of the ubuntu kernel tree. So stop building it from here. >> >> fix clean/make target in gfs-kernel since gulm is long way gone. > Hi Fabio, > > NACK. Actually, I've been working to get gfs and gfs-kernel to build > properly > with the upstream kernel and new infrastructure changes. > I've got a gfs-kernel that compiles now (but needs other things, regarding > the locking infrastructure), and I'm working on getting the gfs tools to > use > udev's libvolume_id rather than iddev, as we did for the gfs2 userspace > tools. Ok perfect! I wasn't aware of general plan and directions (or I might have just missed them) so i did prefer to raise the issue. > So hopefully in the next few business days, I'll have these compiling > properly > and committed to CVS. Until then, I apologize for the compile problems. It's not a problem. In Ubuntu we are dropping gfs for the next release to focus on gfs2. My main concern was for CVS users that builds from the top level dir. > You're right that the gfs2-kernel stuff should not be compiled out of CVS, > because that's all in a public git tree now, and that's where people > should get it. > I'm not sure about the plans for gnbd at the moment, so I'll defer to > someone else. Agreed 100%. Thanks! Fabio -- I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.