From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wendy Cheng Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:19:38 -0400 Subject: [NFS] [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/4 Revised] NLM - lock failover In-Reply-To: <17973.9710.650004.160243@notabene.brown> References: <46315EED.9020103@redhat.com> <17969.37229.250000.895316@notabene.brown> <20070427111513.GA25126@salusa.poochiereds.net> <17969.61232.323762.29003@notabene.brown> <20070427134248.GB25126@salusa.poochiereds.net> <20070427141710.GA11484@infradead.org> <20070427154259.GF32278@fieldses.org> <46321870.7000607@redhat.com> <20070427163129.GI32278@fieldses.org> <17970.30655.854497.849900@notabene.brown> <20070429201353.GA23531@fieldses.org> <17973.9710.650004.160243@notabene.brown> Message-ID: <46357C6A.7080007@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Neil Brown wrote: >But we probably don't need to go over-board straight away. >I like the interface: > echo -n "flag flag .. /path/name" > /proc/fs/nfsd/filesystem_settings > >where if flags is "?flag", then the value is returned by a subsequent >read on the same file-descriptor. > > > Will do a quick prototype to see whether this would work as good as it appears. I haven't given up RPC call (into lockd) either since it seems to be a bright idea. -- Wendy