From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 17:35:39 -0400
Subject: [NFS] [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/4 Revised] NLM - lock failover
In-Reply-To: <20070504184220.GJ10434@fieldses.org>
References: <20070427111513.GA25126@salusa.poochiereds.net>
	<17969.61232.323762.29003@notabene.brown>
	<20070427134248.GB25126@salusa.poochiereds.net>
	<20070427141710.GA11484@infradead.org>
	<20070427154259.GF32278@fieldses.org> <46321870.7000607@redhat.com>
	<20070427163129.GI32278@fieldses.org>
	<17970.30655.854497.849900@notabene.brown>
	<20070429201353.GA23531@fieldses.org>
	<17973.9710.650004.160243@notabene.brown>
	<20070504184220.GJ10434@fieldses.org>
Message-ID: <463BA72B.6090901@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

J. Bruce Fields wrote:

>On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:10:38AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
>  
>
>>where if flags is "?flag", then the value is returned by a subsequent
>>read on the same file-descriptor.
>>    
>>
>
>The ?flag thing seems a little awkward.  It'd be nice if we could get
>all the flags for a single filesystem just by cat'ing an appropriate
>file.
>
>--b.
>  
>
ok, make sense ... Wendy