From: Robert Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] GFS2: kernel changes to support new gfs2_grow command (Try 3)
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 16:48:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <463BAA28.7000407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070504202317.GA16877@redhat.com>
David Teigland wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:57:08PM -0500, Robert Peterson wrote:
>> @@ -978,18 +1038,25 @@ int gfs2_inplace_reserve_i(struct gfs2_inode *ip,
>
>> - error = gfs2_rindex_hold(sdp, &al->al_ri_gh);
>> + /* We need to hold the rindex unless the inode we're using is
>> + the rindex itself, in which case it's already held. */
>> + if (ip != GFS2_I(sdp->sd_rindex))
>> + error = gfs2_rindex_hold(sdp, &al->al_ri_gh);
>> + else if (!sdp->sd_rgrps) /* We may not have the rindex read in, so: */
>> + error = gfs2_check_rindex_version(sdp);
>> +
>
> I don't see why we need this change, the original looks correct.
If we're updating through the meta_fs, the rindex file will already be
glocked and held through its inode.
> So there are the two distinct parts to the fs-grow procedure. The first
> is writing to the rindex and statfs files -- this is what was missing in
> gfs2, and I'm ignoring that part for now.
>
> The second part is gfs detecting that a grow took place and updating its
> list of rg's. I don't think this part needs any changing at all, it
> should work the same way it always has -- this is what I'm focussing on.
I'll re-test test the original code path to make sure that this part of
the fix is still really necessary.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat Cluster Suite
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-04 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-03 1:57 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] GFS2: kernel changes to support new gfs2_grow command (Try 3) Robert Peterson
2007-05-04 16:47 ` David Teigland
2007-05-04 21:35 ` Robert Peterson
2007-05-04 22:16 ` David Teigland
2007-05-04 19:37 ` David Teigland
2007-05-04 21:37 ` Robert Peterson
2007-05-08 14:56 ` Robert Peterson
2007-05-04 20:23 ` David Teigland
2007-05-04 21:48 ` Robert Peterson [this message]
2007-05-04 22:04 ` David Teigland
2007-05-08 14:17 ` Robert Peterson
2007-05-08 14:24 ` Steven Whitehouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-08 20:42 David Teigland
2007-05-08 20:43 David Teigland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=463BAA28.7000407@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).