From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:35:15 -0700
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH] gfs2: better code for translating
	characters
In-Reply-To: <91b13c310708130219j170190f6r100c47171f92077@mail.gmail.com>
References: <11869741183677-git-send-email-crquan@gmail.com>	
	<91b13c310708122008w27b86359n5b135df3e229e616@mail.gmail.com>	
	<46BFDDBB.2020104@zytor.com>	
	<91b13c310708122206v5e4023f2w7464611a96ae67d9@mail.gmail.com>	
	<46BFF179.8060308@zytor.com>
	<91b13c310708130219j170190f6r100c47171f92077@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <46C08843.8010302@zytor.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

rae l wrote:
> On 8/13/07, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>> You seem to have confused modern compiled C with an old BASIC interpreter.
>>
>> Consider the code in point:
>>
>> -       while ((table = strchr(sdp->sd_table_name, '/')))
>> +       table = sdp->sd_table_name;
>> +       while ((table = strchr(table, '/')))
>>                 *table = '_';
> Sorry, I just mean for call to strchr, things are different,
> especially for multiple '/' chars appeared.

Things are different only for multiple '/' chars.  In that case, the
latter form is better, in the former case, there is no difference.

So it doesn't matter.  One is unambiguously better.

	-hpa