From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:17:08 -0500
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands
In-Reply-To: <20080117161415.GE16581@fieldses.org>
References: <4783E3C9.3040803@redhat.com>
	<20080109180214.GA31071@infradead.org>
	<20080110075959.GA9623@infradead.org> <4788665B.4020405@redhat.com>
	<18315.62909.330258.83038@notabene.brown>
	<478D14C5.1000804@redhat.com>
	<18317.7319.443532.62244@notabene.brown>
	<478D3820.9080402@redhat.com> <20080117151007.GB16581@fieldses.org>
	<478F78E8.40601@redhat.com> <20080117161415.GE16581@fieldses.org>
Message-ID: <478F7F84.4040909@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Yeah, sounds good.  Maybe under Documentation/filesystems?  And it might
> also be helpful to leave a reference to it in the code, e.g., in
> nfsctl.c:
>
> 	/*
> 	 * The following are used for failover; see
> 	 * Documentation/filesystems/nfsd-failover.txt for details.
> 	 */
>
> --b.
>   

ok, looks good ... but let's "fix" this on the resume patch ? or you 
want it on the unlock patch *now* ?

-- Wendy