From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subhendu Ghosh Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [Cluster-devel] [RFC] Splitting cluster.git into separate projects/trees In-Reply-To: <20081114215718.GA7394@redhat.com> References: <1226654293.4022.56.camel@daitarn-fedora.int.fabbione.net> <20081114172530.GB4054@redhat.com> <20081114173743.GC18678@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <26ef5e70811141311u54f5c2d6j873e5fd3977336ea@mail.gmail.com> <20081114215718.GA7394@redhat.com> Message-ID: <491DFC9E.9000203@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit David Teigland wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git >> and rgmanager.git in another. >> But I may be missing some of the interdependencies. > > I wouldn't mind either of those combinations. Maybe rgmanager's last > stand will be in cluster.git anyway... if so, then it's not a factor. > > I didn't have much reason for separating fence/fence-agents. We're > planning on unifying it all anyway, even if the agents are done sooner. > And I don't think packaging/releasing agents separately should have much > bearing on the source tree? (I've heard interest in putting agents in > their own package for Fedora.) > > Dave > > Cobbler is also starting to use the fence agents in a totally non-cluster related way. So some separate of fence/fenced from fence agents - at least on the packaging end - would be really useful -subhendu