From: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: fix lowcomms_connect_node for sctp
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:50:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB73E4C.2060000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090918213754.GA18138@redhat.com>
On 18/09/09 22:37, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:39:06PM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
>> The recently added dlm_lowcomms_connect_node() from
>> 391fbdc5d527149578490db2f1619951d91f3561 does not work
>> when using SCTP instead of TCP. The sctp connection code
>> has nothing to do without data to send. Check for no data
>> in the sctp connection code and do nothing instead of
>> triggering a BUG. Also have connect_node() do nothing
>> when the protocol is sctp.
That patch looks sane to me
> With this patch I can use sctp (single interface), but I'm getting these
> alloc_fd errors (which seem harmless enough) have you seen them before?
Yes I have seen them before. At the time I put them down to either a bug
in SCTP or an artifact of the way it works, because lowcomms isn't
explicitly allocating any new FDs here - they are hidden behind the sctp
layer and passed back to use later on in process_sctp_notification().
> Also, gfs is *really* slow using sctp!
I haven't done any benchmarks for ages. The last time some were done I
was told that SCTP was actually faster than TCP! ... though that was
with the 'old' DLM. I put this down to the fact that SCTP is optimised
for streaming because of its origins.
If it's now slowed down a lot it's probably worth investigating further
- I really wouldn't expect the single-home configurations to differ by
very much.
Chrissie.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-21 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-18 19:39 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: fix lowcomms_connect_node for sctp David Teigland
2009-09-18 21:37 ` David Teigland
2009-09-21 8:50 ` Christine Caulfield [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB73E4C.2060000@redhat.com \
--to=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).