cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: fix lowcomms_connect_node for sctp
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:50:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB73E4C.2060000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090918213754.GA18138@redhat.com>

On 18/09/09 22:37, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:39:06PM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
>> The recently added dlm_lowcomms_connect_node() from
>> 391fbdc5d527149578490db2f1619951d91f3561 does not work
>> when using SCTP instead of TCP.  The sctp connection code
>> has nothing to do without data to send.  Check for no data
>> in the sctp connection code and do nothing instead of
>> triggering a BUG.  Also have connect_node() do nothing
>> when the protocol is sctp.

That patch looks sane to me

> With this patch I can use sctp (single interface), but I'm getting these
> alloc_fd errors (which seem harmless enough) have you seen them before?

Yes I have seen them before. At the time I put them down to either a bug 
in SCTP or an artifact of the way it works, because lowcomms isn't 
explicitly allocating any new FDs here - they are hidden behind the sctp 
layer and passed back to use later on in process_sctp_notification().

> Also, gfs is *really* slow using sctp!


I haven't done any benchmarks for ages. The last time some were done I 
was told that SCTP was actually faster than TCP! ... though that was 
with the 'old' DLM. I put this down to the fact that SCTP is optimised 
for streaming because of its origins.

If it's now slowed down a lot it's probably worth investigating further 
- I really wouldn't expect the single-home configurations to differ by 
very much.

Chrissie.



      reply	other threads:[~2009-09-21  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-18 19:39 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: fix lowcomms_connect_node for sctp David Teigland
2009-09-18 21:37 ` David Teigland
2009-09-21  8:50   ` Christine Caulfield [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AB73E4C.2060000@redhat.com \
    --to=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).