From: Marek 'marx' Grác <mgrac@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: fence-agents: master - fencing: New option '--missing-as-off' to return OFF is machine is missing
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:56:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD85F61.2090408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091014174324.GB28090@redhat.com>
David Teigland wrote:
>> fencing: New option '--missing-as-off' to return OFF is machine is missing
>>
>> If a blade is not present (i.e. removed for maintenance), the fence_bladecenter
>> cannot check the state as it is reported empty.
>>
>> Resolves: bz#248006
>>
>
>
>> --- a/fence/agents/bladecenter/fence_bladecenter.py
>> +++ b/fence/agents/bladecenter/fence_bladecenter.py
>> @@ -30,7 +30,10 @@ def get_power_status(conn, options):
>> i = conn.log_expect(options, [ node_cmd, "system>" ] , int(options["-Y"]))
>> if i == 1:
>> ## Given blade number does not exist
>> - fail(EC_STATUS)
>> + if options.has_key("-M"):
>> + return "off"
>> + else:
>> + fail(EC_STATUS)
>>
>
> I've never used bladecenter, so I don't know when a blade number doesn't
> exist. Does it reliably indicate that the blade is off? If so, then
> should we default to that without a new option? If not, then this option
> sounds bad, because it's effectively an automation of manual override, no?
>
Yes, it is reliable. We can turn it on as default but imho it will cause
inconsistency on how fence agents works as all other refuse to work with
port that does not exist. In general we can divide fence agents in
several categories:
* iLO-like -> 1 machine we have to connect to --> if we can't connect
we don't know if problem is in iLO or connection to machine
* APC-like -> N machines connected to central device --> we can switch
outlet ON/OFF and we don't have to care if there is something connected
* virtual machines -> we usually don't need to remove them for maintaince
* Blade-like -> unlike APC we can work only with machines that are
connected - so maintainance can be problem
> The typical issue with nodes removed for maintenance is that startup
> fencing tries to fence them and can't, for any agent. The solution to
> that has always been manual override or removing the node from
> cluster.conf.
>
m,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-16 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091014130639.2DE881201DA@lists.fedorahosted.org>
2009-10-14 17:43 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: fence-agents: master - fencing: New option '--missing-as-off' to return OFF is machine is missing David Teigland
2009-10-16 11:56 ` Marek 'marx' Grác [this message]
2009-10-16 15:57 ` David Teigland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD85F61.2090408@redhat.com \
--to=mgrac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).