From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:24:24 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [Openais] [RFC] Proposal to align autotool versions In-Reply-To: <1259079150.2822.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4B0BE0C6.4000702@redhat.com> <1259079150.2822.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <4B0C08B8.5060103@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steven Dake wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 14:33 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I just completed testing of autotools in F13/rawhide and they seem to >> fulfill perfectly what we need so far. >> >> Fedora13 has: >> >> libtool 2.2.6 (doesn?t carry the bug for which we were forcing 2.2.7) >> autoconf 2.64 (higher than what we require now) >> automake 1.11/m4/pkg-config in more than recent enough versions. >> > > There is no motivation (ie bugs) to change the dependency to a later > version autoconf for corosync. > You would end up using that version anyway. What matters mostly is to set a minimum for libtool. The other packages are "less important" because they are all in sufficient versions. Fabio