From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:15:31 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [patch] cman: Added checkquorum script for self fencing In-Reply-To: <1296687643.25681.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <702705878.661260.1296594791720.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4D490AF1.3000104@redhat.com> <1296687643.25681.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <4D4A4803.7090701@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/03/2011 12:00 AM, Lon Hohberger wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 08:42 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> Both patches are ACK. >> >> I have only one simple question and far from being a problem. We ship >> this script as example basically, since we don?t install in >> /etc/watchdog.d automatically. I think it would be best to move it to >> the doc section since we require users to copy and edit the parameters. >> Tho it also raises the question that you could simply symlink it from >> watchdog.d if it?s in sharedir/cluster since it?s location would be >> fixed (vs doc changes with versioning of the package). > > If packaging in CentOS, you will need watchdog >= 5.5-8 or > else /etc/watchdog.d won't exist. Let's make that a release note for upstream. We don't package Centos and they pull in from our repo directly. Fabio