From: Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] RFC: generic improvement to fence agents api
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:34:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D844E8F.1050608@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi all,
while discussing on linux-cluster the support of the Tripp Lite switched
PDU, it occurred to me that we can effectively improve (almost half) the
time it takes to perform power fencing of certain devices, when for
example, more than one PSU needs to be powered off to complete the action.
Node X has 2 PSU.
In our current state, the config would look like:
<clusternode .....>
<fence>
<method...>
<device name="..." port="1"/>
<device name="..." port="2"/>
.....
it means effectively spawning, most likely the same agent, twice.
Increasing the time it takes to fence and maybe increasing the
possibility to fail to fence if the second connection fails.
My suggestion would be to allow to specify a list of ports instead.
<clusternode .....>
<fence>
<method...>
<device name="..." ports="1 2"/>
....
Either by using a new keyword "ports" or re-using "port" itself. If
using "port", current configuration will continue to work as-is and the
change effectively would not introduce any backward compatibility issue.
This way the agent can:
1) connect once (reducing in most cases the ssh/telnet/whatever time)
2) issue the OFF command as fast as possible (almost in parallel)
3) then wait for the results.
By adopting a list, the configuration would look cleaner too IMHO.
A quick glance, the change should not affect fenced (David can you
confirm please?), and most agents could handle it via the fencing python
lib (Marek?).
Does it sound reasonable?
Cheers
Fabio
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-19 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-19 6:34 Fabio M. Di Nitto [this message]
2011-03-19 17:14 ` [Cluster-devel] RFC: generic improvement to fence agents api Digimer
2011-03-19 17:32 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2011-03-19 18:44 ` Digimer
2011-03-21 8:40 ` Marek Grac
2011-03-21 10:44 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2011-03-21 17:07 ` David Teigland
2011-03-21 17:09 ` Digimer
2011-03-21 17:16 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2011-03-21 17:37 ` Lon Hohberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D844E8F.1050608@redhat.com \
--to=fdinitto@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).