From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:41:48 +0200 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [Linux-ha-dev] new resource agents repository commit policy In-Reply-To: <20110328152813.GA6989@rondo.homenet> References: <20110314170753.GB3650@squib> <20110318092048.GE23764@suse.de> <20110328152813.GA6989@rondo.homenet> Message-ID: <4D90AC3C.40805@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/28/2011 5:28 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >> On 2011-03-14T19:49:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >>> I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy. >>> The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this >>> and impose minimal overhead. >> >> I prefer b as well, since it adds another review step. (Should we use >> the github.com code review tools?) > > OK. It seems like nobody's that much interesting in this, so we > can just as well go with option b). WFM of course. > > Fabio, I'd like to get the commit access rights. Florian Haas and > Lars Ellenberg have also been frequently reviewing user > contributions, so they should get commit rights too. I understand > that Florian already has that. Lars is about to create a > github.com account and he'll send you later his account name. You will need to talk to Andrew for this. I am not the owner of the repo. For now I did merge bits from Florian and I can do it while Andrew will allow accounts to commit. > >> Oh, and we can use the ha-wg-technical mailing list for cross-project >> coordination ;-) > > Yes, but the list is very new and some people who may be affected > are perhaps not all subscribed. Let?s make sure that the message is sent again to the mailing lists, we can clearly still collect patches on the old lists for two/three months while we transition. Fabio