From: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:42:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE20B9B.90107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a30bad4-2f62-4ac7-b356-3a2e3a298878@zmail12.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Hi Bob,
On 20/06/12 17:15, Bob Peterson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> | + absname = canonicalize_file_name(sdp->device_name);
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I just wanted to point out that in the past we've
> used realpath rather than canonicalize_file_name. For example, see this patch
> we did a long time ago to gfs2_tool:
>
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=cluster.git;a=commitdiff;h=e70898cfa09939a7100a057433fff3a4ad666bdd
Hmm those uses of realpath seem to have disappeared since.
> It would be nice if our use was consistent. I'm not sure if there's an
> advantage of one over the other. If canonicalize_file_name is now preferred
> upstream over realpath, we should probably replace all occurrences of that.
>
> On the other hand, if realpath is now preferred upstream, we should adjust
> this patch to use it instead. AFAIK, they are the same, and I don't have a
> personal preference; whatever is most favoured by the upstream community. :)
I couldn't find any strong arguments in preference of either function
and we're already using _GNU_SOURCE extensions so there's no added
portability issue. In the current state of gfs2-utils.git we're only
using realpath twice, in gfs2_quota, so I don't think there's a strong
consistency argument either. I'll push this one as-is in the morning
unless someone can provide a convincing reason to use realpath :)
> Otherwise, the patch looks good.
Thanks for the review,
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 15:47 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents Andrew Price
2012-06-20 16:15 ` Bob Peterson
2012-06-20 17:27 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2012-06-20 17:42 ` Andrew Price [this message]
2012-06-28 9:16 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-06-28 9:58 ` Andrew Price
2012-06-28 10:01 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-06-28 17:52 ` Andrew Price
2012-07-04 11:02 ` Andrew Price
2012-07-04 11:15 ` Steven Whitehouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE20B9B.90107@redhat.com \
--to=anprice@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).