From: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:02:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF422CE.9060501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FEC99CC.6010309@redhat.com>
On 06/28/2012 06:52 PM, Andrew Price wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 11:01 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, v2 is ok too. I think I missed that in my first pass over my email
>> today. To do this properly, we should be opening the path that we are
>> passed, and then doing the remaining operations with just the fd. We
>> could do that with "file" if we used the -f - option and passed the fd
>> as standard input to the process.
>
> The only way I can think of passing the fd to file -f - would be the C
> equivalent of:
>
> printf "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd" | file -f -
>
> Which would mean adding another pipe() and fork(). So we might as well
> just shorten it to:
>
> file "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd"
>
> Would this solve the race condition problem? Or am I misunderstanding
> how you intended it to be done?
I didn't get a reply to this. Does the above method seem sensible or
would we need to read the start of the file/device ourselves and pipe it
into 'file -' to avoid opening the file twice?
Andy
>> That way we also remove any possible race conditions too, but this is
>> good enough for now,
>>
>> Steve.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 10:58 +0100, Andrew Price wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> On 06/28/2012 10:16 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Looks good. ACK,
>>>
>>> This one was obsoleted by the v2 patch I posted on the 21st. If you
>>> prefer this one though I can push it instead.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Steve.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:47 +0100, Andrew Price wrote:
>>>>> When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points
>>>>> to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
>>>>>
>>>>> # ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test
>>>>> This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test.
>>>>> It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to
>>>>> make
>>>>> the output more informative:
>>>>>
>>>>> # ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test
>>>>> This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test.
>>>>> It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096,
>>>>> lockproto lock_nolock)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c b/gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c
>>>>> index e6b00a0..f8e4741 100644
>>>>> --- a/gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c
>>>>> +++ b/gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c
>>>>> @@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>> int error;
>>>>> int rgsize_specified = 0;
>>>>> unsigned char uuid[16];
>>>>> + char *absname;
>>>>>
>>>>> memset(sdp, 0, sizeof(struct gfs2_sbd));
>>>>> sdp->bsize = -1;
>>>>> @@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + absname = canonicalize_file_name(sdp->device_name);
>>>>> + if (absname == NULL) {
>>>>> + perror(_("Could not find the absolute path of the device"));
>>>>> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> if (!sdp->override) {
>>>>> printf( _("This will destroy any data on %s.\n"),
>>>>> sdp->device_name);
>>>>> - check_dev_content(sdp->device_name);
>>>>> + check_dev_content(absname);
>>>>> are_you_sure();
>>>>> }
>>>>> + free(absname);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (sdp->bsize == -1) {
>>>>> if (S_ISREG(sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-04 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 15:47 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents Andrew Price
2012-06-20 16:15 ` Bob Peterson
2012-06-20 17:27 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2012-06-20 17:42 ` Andrew Price
2012-06-28 9:16 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-06-28 9:58 ` Andrew Price
2012-06-28 10:01 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-06-28 17:52 ` Andrew Price
2012-07-04 11:02 ` Andrew Price [this message]
2012-07-04 11:15 ` Steven Whitehouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF422CE.9060501@redhat.com \
--to=anprice@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).