From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:54:16 +0200 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] rgmanager: Add IP "interface" parameter In-Reply-To: <50008044.6070102@redhat.com> References: <20120712172325.GA117794@redhat.com> <4FFF9F36.2040007@redhat.com> <50008044.6070102@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5001CE68.5060302@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/13/2012 10:08 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote: > On 07/13/2012 12:08 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> Hi Ryan, >> >> only one comment here.. many times we have been asked to implement >> "interface" parameter to allow any random IP on any specific interface >> (beside the pre configured ip on that interface). > > We haven't done that because we might end up owning routing. However, > if we make it explicit that this is not the case, then we could in > theory do both. hmm right.. forgot about that. I would still prefer to avoid the use of interface="" option if possible tho. Maybe something slightly less overloaded. force_interface or force_net_device. Fabio