From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lon Hohberger <lhh@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:07:02 -0400
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] rgmanager: Add IP "interface" parameter
In-Reply-To: <5001CE68.5060302@redhat.com>
References: <20120712172325.GA117794@redhat.com> <4FFF9F36.2040007@redhat.com>
	<50008044.6070102@redhat.com> <5001CE68.5060302@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <5009C876.502@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07/14/2012 03:54 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> On 07/13/2012 10:08 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote:
>> On 07/13/2012 12:08 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>
>>> only one comment here.. many times we have been asked to implement
>>> "interface" parameter to allow any random IP on any specific interface
>>> (beside the pre configured ip on that interface).
>>
>> We haven't done that because we might end up owning routing.  However,
>> if we make it explicit that this is not the case, then we could in
>> theory do both.
> 
> hmm right.. forgot about that.
> 
> I would still prefer to avoid the use of interface="" option if possible
> tho. Maybe something slightly less overloaded. force_interface or
> force_net_device.
> 

Sure; that's fine.

prefer_interface=""

maybe?  "If more than one match, use this one, otherwise, use the one
that matches"

-- Lon