From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 06:47:50 +0200
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] rgmanager: Add IP "interface" parameter
In-Reply-To: <5009C876.502@redhat.com>
References: <20120712172325.GA117794@redhat.com> <4FFF9F36.2040007@redhat.com>
	<50008044.6070102@redhat.com> <5001CE68.5060302@redhat.com>
	<5009C876.502@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <500A3476.7090304@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07/20/2012 11:07 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On 07/14/2012 03:54 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
>> On 07/13/2012 10:08 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote:
>>> On 07/13/2012 12:08 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>
>>>> only one comment here.. many times we have been asked to implement
>>>> "interface" parameter to allow any random IP on any specific interface
>>>> (beside the pre configured ip on that interface).
>>>
>>> We haven't done that because we might end up owning routing.  However,
>>> if we make it explicit that this is not the case, then we could in
>>> theory do both.
>>
>> hmm right.. forgot about that.
>>
>> I would still prefer to avoid the use of interface="" option if possible
>> tho. Maybe something slightly less overloaded. force_interface or
>> force_net_device.
>>
> 
> Sure; that's fine.
> 
> prefer_interface=""
> 
> maybe?  "If more than one match, use this one, otherwise, use the one
> that matches"

Yes that sounds a lot better than force_* :)

Thanks
Fabio