From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Grac <mgrac@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:01:16 +0100
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Fence agent for Tripplite PDU
In-Reply-To: <52B98DE8.1090803@mirantis.com>
References: <52A74740.8020904@redhat.com> <52A82671.1000604@mirantis.com>
	<52AF18ED.8090906@redhat.com> <52AF260F.6070403@mirantis.com>
	<52B2F537.8060002@redhat.com> <52B98DE8.1090803@mirantis.com>
Message-ID: <52CAA91C.8030001@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 12/24/2013 02:36 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:

>> If the only modification was done in OIDs, I will prefer to include it
>> into fence_apc_snmp. We have already used a symlinks to run fence agents
> Done. Here are 2 patches for master and RHEL6 branches for
> fence_apc_snmp agent, with added Tripplite PDU support.
>
>> with different default options and I believe we can use same approach
>> there as well (e.g. fence_ilo3 / fence_ipmilan). Can you take a look at
>> current upstream version and test it there? Ideally check if it will
> I've tested the patch for RHEL6 branch with my Tripplite PDU. And as you
> could have noticed, there is no difference between the patch for RHEL6
> and one for master branch, thus, you can assume tests is OK for master
> as well...
>

Thanks for patch, I have no objection and patch is now included in the 
upstream.

m,