From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:53:58 +0100
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 1/2][TRY #2] GFS2: Move glock
 superblock pointer to field gl_name
In-Reply-To: <CAHc6FU6NKPU3QuM0qbGJ1wtVoOs+OXq7J4izcui5xu86kav6sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1436466345-11383-1-git-send-email-rpeterso@redhat.com>
	<1436466345-11383-2-git-send-email-rpeterso@redhat.com>
	<55A39EA6.3050302@redhat.com>
	<910441860.37476260.1436794765629.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
	<55A40F47.1080002@redhat.com>
	<CAHc6FU6NKPU3QuM0qbGJ1wtVoOs+OXq7J4izcui5xu86kav6sg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55D9A646.2050903@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 22/08/15 23:00, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Bob,
>
> how hard would it be to move the rhashtable into struct gfs2_sbd instead?
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas

What would be the advantage?

Steve.