* [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Don't waste time locking lru_lock for non-lru glocks
[not found] <842931352.34658265.1501085354071.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
@ 2017-07-26 16:10 ` Bob Peterson
2017-07-26 16:11 ` Steven Whitehouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bob Peterson @ 2017-07-26 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Hi,
Before this patch, glock_dq would call gfs2_glock_remove_from_lru.
For glocks that are never put on the LRU, such as the transaction
glock, this just takes the spin_lock, determines there's nothing to
be done because the list is empty, then unlocks again. This was
causing unnecessary lock contention on the lru_lock spin_lock.
This patch adds a check for GLOF_LRU in the glops before taking
the spin_lock, thus reducing lru_lock contention.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index c38ab6c81898..1029340fc8ba 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ void gfs2_glock_add_to_lru(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
static void gfs2_glock_remove_from_lru(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
{
+ if (!(gl->gl_ops->go_flags & GLOF_LRU))
+ return;
+
spin_lock(&lru_lock);
if (!list_empty(&gl->gl_lru)) {
list_del_init(&gl->gl_lru);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Don't waste time locking lru_lock for non-lru glocks
2017-07-26 16:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Don't waste time locking lru_lock for non-lru glocks Bob Peterson
@ 2017-07-26 16:11 ` Steven Whitehouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Whitehouse @ 2017-07-26 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Hi,
Looks good.
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Steve.
On 26/07/17 17:10, Bob Peterson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before this patch, glock_dq would call gfs2_glock_remove_from_lru.
> For glocks that are never put on the LRU, such as the transaction
> glock, this just takes the spin_lock, determines there's nothing to
> be done because the list is empty, then unlocks again. This was
> causing unnecessary lock contention on the lru_lock spin_lock.
> This patch adds a check for GLOF_LRU in the glops before taking
> the spin_lock, thus reducing lru_lock contention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> index c38ab6c81898..1029340fc8ba 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ void gfs2_glock_add_to_lru(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
>
> static void gfs2_glock_remove_from_lru(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
> {
> + if (!(gl->gl_ops->go_flags & GLOF_LRU))
> + return;
> +
> spin_lock(&lru_lock);
> if (!list_empty(&gl->gl_lru)) {
> list_del_init(&gl->gl_lru);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-26 16:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <842931352.34658265.1501085354071.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2017-07-26 16:10 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Don't waste time locking lru_lock for non-lru glocks Bob Peterson
2017-07-26 16:11 ` Steven Whitehouse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).