From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] gfs2: Extended attribute readahead
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:02:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563904DB.6020900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1797651004.2591857.1446571755023.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 03/11/15 17:29, Bob Peterson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> When gfs2 allocates an inode and its extended attribute block next to
>> each other at inode create time, the inode's directory entry indicates
>> that in de_rahead. In that case, we can readahead the extended
>> attribute block when we read in the inode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> fs/gfs2/dir.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>> fs/gfs2/incore.h | 1 +
>> fs/gfs2/meta_io.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> fs/gfs2/meta_io.h | 2 +-
>> fs/gfs2/quota.c | 2 +-
>> fs/gfs2/rgrp.c | 2 +-
>> fs/gfs2/super.c | 1 +
>> fs/gfs2/xattr.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 8 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Most of this looks good. However, two comments:
>
> 1. I don't like adding a new u16 to the gfs2_inode. I've been working to
> reduce the size of gfs2's inodes lately, so I'd rather see this
> implemented as a new GIF_RAHEAD (or similar) flag in gfs2_inode's i_flags.
> 2. It seems to me like we should take advantage of function gfs2_meta_ra()
> which already submits one block and a variable number of additional
> blocks for read-ahead, then waits for the first block IO to complete.
The meta_ra thing is a bit of a hack, and best avoided for this use. We
want to only send out a single I/O here rather than let the I/O stack do
the merging after the fact,
Steve.
> Regards,
>
> Bob Peterson
> Red Hat File Systems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-01 19:02 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Extended attribute readahead Andreas Gruenbacher
2015-11-01 19:02 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] gfs2: " Andreas Gruenbacher
2015-11-03 17:29 ` Bob Peterson
2015-11-03 19:02 ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2015-11-03 20:18 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2015-11-01 19:02 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/2] gfs2: Extended attribute readahead optimization Andreas Gruenbacher
2015-11-12 13:44 ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-11-12 15:33 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2015-11-12 20:15 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2015-11-12 20:33 ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-11-13 22:24 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2015-11-16 18:14 ` Bob Peterson
2015-11-13 13:48 ` Bob Peterson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563904DB.6020900@redhat.com \
--to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).