From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Peterson Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:04:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Cluster-devel] Assertion failure: sdp->sd_log_blks_free <= sdp->sd_jdesc->jd_blocks In-Reply-To: <529b370d-bf7b-64eb-dd84-acc567299070@citrix.com> References: <745330930.13931854.1553021309310.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <06bfe342-bebb-e464-4759-eedc641db017@citrix.com> <1543432043.15176772.1553527757339.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <529b370d-bf7b-64eb-dd84-acc567299070@citrix.com> Message-ID: <605688868.15773477.1553706269793.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ross, ----- Original Message ----- > > I think the problem may actually be a regression with patch 588bff95c94ef. > > I still hit the assertion with this patch. gfs2_log_write_header() is > unconditionally called and it calls gfs2_log_bmap() which changes > sd_log_flush_head in the success path. Hi Ross, Okay, it looks like I really screwed up patch 588bff95c94ef. The patch I posted yesterday is grossly inadequate and that code path needs some major fixing. I'm in the process of getting it fixed properly. Sorry I didn't cc you on that last patch. I'll cc you on the new one when it's ready, but it may take a couple hours to get it ready. Regards, Bob Peterson Red Hat File Systems