From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find (2)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:39:36 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <631177443.68537540.1548880776738.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129003511.953A720870@mail.kernel.org>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: 2d29f6b96d8f gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find.
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.5, v4.19.18, v4.14.96,
> v4.9.153, v4.4.172, v3.18.133.
>
> v4.20.5: Build OK!
> v4.19.18: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}")
> e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we
> can")
>
> v4.14.96: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}")
> dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too
> long")
> e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we
> can")
>
> v4.9.153: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws
> occur")
> 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}")
> 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction")
> dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too
> long")
> e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we
> can")
> ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw")
>
> v4.4.172: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws
> occur")
> 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}")
> 3e11e5304150 ("GFS2: ignore unlock failures after withdraw")
> 471f3db2786b ("gfs2: change gfs2 readdir cookie")
> 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction")
> dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too
> long")
> e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we
> can")
> ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw")
>
> v3.18.133: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 0d1c7ae9d849 ("GFS2: Prevent BUG from occurring when normal Withdraws
> occur")
> 281b4952d185 ("gfs2: Rename bitmap.bi_{len => bytes}")
> 2e60d7683c8d ("GFS2: update freeze code to use freeze/thaw_super on all
> nodes")
> 3cdcf63ed2d1 ("GFS2: use kvfree() instead of open-coding it")
> 3e11e5304150 ("GFS2: ignore unlock failures after withdraw")
> 471f3db2786b ("gfs2: change gfs2 readdir cookie")
> 9862ca056e65 ("GFS2: Switch tr_touched to flag in transaction")
> a3e3213676d8 ("gfs2: fix shadow warning in gfs2_rbm_find()")
> dc8fbb03dcd6 ("GFS2: gfs2_free_extlen can return an extent that is too
> long")
> e54c78a27fcd ("gfs2: Use fs_* functions instead of pr_* function where we
> can")
> ed17545d01e4 ("GFS2: Allow glocks to be unlocked after withdraw")
>
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
Hi Sasha,
We have found problems with the "gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find (2)" patch,
so for now we would like to revert the patch it's trying to fix, which is
"gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find" (the original).
Andreas Gruenbacher just sent a revert request for the broken patch to Linus,
so we should just delete "gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find (2)" until we can
get a proper replacement and test it thoroughly.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-24 15:57 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] gfs2: Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find (2) Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-01-24 17:43 ` Bob Peterson
2019-01-24 18:32 ` Bob Peterson
2019-01-29 0:35 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-30 20:39 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-31 14:42 Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-02-02 14:38 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=631177443.68537540.1548880776738.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).