* [Cluster-devel] [fsck.gfs2 PATCH 1 of 2] fsck.gfs2: Change duptree structure to have generic flags
[not found] <1801707002.28854843.1435762178016.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
@ 2015-07-01 14:50 ` Bob Peterson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bob Peterson @ 2015-07-01 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Hi,
This is part 1 of a 2-patch set for fsck.gfs2.
This patch does not change any functionality. It merely changes the
specialized first_ref_found flag to a flag within a multi-flag var.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/gfs2/fsck/fsck.h b/gfs2/fsck/fsck.h
index 09db668..78e8ad4 100644
--- a/gfs2/fsck/fsck.h
+++ b/gfs2/fsck/fsck.h
@@ -57,9 +57,11 @@ struct dir_status {
uint32_t entry_count;
};
+#define DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND 1 /* Has the original reference been found? */
+
struct duptree {
struct osi_node node;
- int first_ref_found; /* Has the original reference been found? */
+ int dup_flags;
int refs;
uint64_t block;
osi_list_t ref_inode_list; /* list of inodes referencing a dup block */
diff --git a/gfs2/fsck/util.c b/gfs2/fsck/util.c
index efdd132..4022fee 100644
--- a/gfs2/fsck/util.c
+++ b/gfs2/fsck/util.c
@@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ static struct duptree *gfs2_dup_set(uint64_t dblock, int create)
dt->block = dblock;
dt->refs = 1; /* reference 1 is actually the reference we need to
discover in pass1b. */
- dt->first_ref_found = 0;
osi_list_init(&dt->ref_inode_list);
osi_list_init(&dt->ref_invinode_list);
osi_link_node(&dt->node, parent, newn);
@@ -326,7 +325,7 @@ int add_duplicate_ref(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,
/* If we found the duplicate reference but we've already discovered
the first reference (in pass1b) and the other references in pass1,
we don't need to count it, so just return. */
- if (dt->first_ref_found)
+ if (dt->dup_flags & DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND)
return meta_is_good;
/* Check for a previous reference to this duplicate */
@@ -338,7 +337,7 @@ int add_duplicate_ref(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,
that case, we don't want to be confused and consider this second
reference the same as the first. If we do, we'll never be able to
resolve it. The first reference can't be the second reference. */
- if (id && first && !dt->first_ref_found) {
+ if (id && first && !(dt->dup_flags & DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND)) {
log_info(_("Original reference to block %llu (0x%llx) was "
"previously found to be bad and deleted.\n"),
(unsigned long long)block,
@@ -347,7 +346,7 @@ int add_duplicate_ref(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,
"(0x%llx) the first reference.\n"),
(unsigned long long)ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr,
(unsigned long long)ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr);
- dt->first_ref_found = 1;
+ dt->dup_flags |= DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND;
return meta_is_good;
}
@@ -356,7 +355,7 @@ int add_duplicate_ref(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,
reference, we don't want to increment the reference count because
it's already accounted for. */
if (first) {
- dt->first_ref_found = 1;
+ dt->dup_flags |= DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND;
dups_found_first++; /* We found another first ref. */
} else {
dt->refs++;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-07-01 14:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1801707002.28854843.1435762178016.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2015-07-01 14:50 ` [Cluster-devel] [fsck.gfs2 PATCH 1 of 2] fsck.gfs2: Change duptree structure to have generic flags Bob Peterson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).