From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Allow flocks to use normal glock dq rather than dq_wait
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:46:25 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <865335399.3808314.1403793985389.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1660832679.3803950.1403793568127.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Hi,
This patch allows flock glocks to use a non-blocking dequeue rather
than dq_wait. It also reverts the previous patch I had posted regarding
dq_wait. The reverted patch isn't necessarily a bad idea, but I decided
this might avoid unforeseen side effects, and was therefore safer.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/file.c b/fs/gfs2/file.c
index 0740a57..26b3f95 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/file.c
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static int do_flock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
goto out;
flock_lock_file_wait(file,
&(struct file_lock){.fl_type = F_UNLCK});
- gfs2_glock_dq_wait(fl_gh);
+ gfs2_glock_dq(fl_gh);
gfs2_holder_reinit(state, flags, fl_gh);
} else {
error = gfs2_glock_get(GFS2_SB(&ip->i_inode), ip->i_no_addr,
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index b703dcc..ee4e04f 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -1128,9 +1128,7 @@ void gfs2_glock_dq_wait(struct gfs2_holder *gh)
struct gfs2_glock *gl = gh->gh_gl;
gfs2_glock_dq(gh);
might_sleep();
- if (!find_first_holder(gl))
- wait_on_bit(&gl->gl_flags, GLF_DEMOTE, gfs2_glock_demote_wait,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ wait_on_bit(&gl->gl_flags, GLF_DEMOTE, gfs2_glock_demote_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
/**
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-26 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1660832679.3803950.1403793568127.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2014-06-26 14:46 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2014-06-26 16:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] GFS2: Allow flocks to use normal glock dq rather than dq_wait Steven Whitehouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=865335399.3808314.1403793985389.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).