From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:42:23 +0200
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v1] gfs2: increase usage of
 folio_next_index() helper
In-Reply-To: <20230717071938.6204-1-duminjie@vivo.com>
References: <20230717071938.6204-1-duminjie@vivo.com>
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU4_SDSpom3Qvt35AXOmmc3v9EJYksgP4EN3owMEC2y-AA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Minjie,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:20?AM Minjie Du <duminjie@vivo.com> wrote:
> Simplify code pattern of 'folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio)' by using
> the existing helper folio_next_index().
>
> Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@vivo.com>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/aops.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/aops.c b/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> index ae49256b7..5f0254237 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> @@ -272,8 +272,7 @@ static int gfs2_write_jdata_batch(struct address_space *mapping,
>                                  * not be suitable for data integrity
>                                  * writeout).
>                                  */
> -                               *done_index = folio->index +
> -                                       folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +                               *done_index = folio_next_index(folio);
>                                 ret = 1;
>                                 break;
>                         }
> --
> 2.39.0
>

Applied, thanks.

Email addresses like '"open list:GFS2 FILE SYSTEM"
<cluster-devel@redhat.com>' and 'open list
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>' are not helpful though, so could you
please avoid using addresses like that in the future?

Thanks,
Andreas