From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert P. J. Day Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:09:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Fix Kconfig [2/2] In-Reply-To: References: <1166435650.3752.1263.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> <1166435849.3752.1266.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> Message-ID: List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Dec 18 2006 09:57, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > config GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM > > tristate "GFS2 DLM locking module" > >- depends on GFS2_FS > >+ depends on GFS2_FS && NET && INET && (IPV6 || IPV6=n) > > What is this supposed to do? IPV6 || IPV6=n is a tautology AFAICS. no, we just went through that and russell king is correct -- see the brief series of posts from earlier this morning during which i made a fool of myself. :-P although, it *is* curious that there appear to be only four places in the entire source tree that incorporate that type of logical check. i'm still trying to wrap my head around the rationale for that particular combination, since it does seem to be rather infrequent and (at least for me) a little non-intuitive. rday