From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:34:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Fix libdlm static build In-Reply-To: <486DCF26.6070609@redhat.com> References: <486CCEBE.3050809@redhat.com> <1215107637.23062.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <486DCF26.6070609@redhat.com> Message-ID: List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Christine Caulfield wrote: > Lon Hohberger wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 14:06 +0100, Christine Caulfield wrote: >> >>> I don't understand the problem you are trying to fix here. Having PIC >>> objects in the dynamic library and non-PIC in the static is perfectly >>> standard practice. >>> >> >> Well, you can't build a loadable module using a static library w/o >> building PIC. > > Good. Then build against the dynamic one like you're supposed to! Generally this is right, we still want to ship a working version of the static one :) Fabio -- I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.