From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] remove iomap_writepage v2
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:17:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvQ8gwsKZlOH6mlP@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHpGcMLNKrOFxktaH9Wxq0M9O-m+DPrdbB7FQt7qwkzQdm-a-w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:32:06PM +0200, Andreas Gr?nbacher wrote:
> Am Mi., 10. Aug. 2022 um 22:57 Uhr schrieb Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:31:50AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > XFS hasn't had a ->writepage call for a while. After LSF I internally
> > > tested dropping btrfs' callback, and the results looked good: no OOM
> > > kills with dirty/writeback pages remaining, performance parity. Then I
> > > went on vacation and Christoph beat me to the patch :)
> >
> > To avoid duplicating work with you or Christoph ... it seems like the
> > plan is to kill ->writepage entirely soon, so there's no point in me
> > doing a sweep of all the filesystems to convert ->writepage to
> > ->write_folio, correct?
> >
> > I assume the plan for filesystems which have a writepage but don't have
> > a ->writepages (9p, adfs, affs, bfs, ecryptfs, gfs2, hostfs, jfs, minix,
> > nilfs2, ntfs, ocfs2, reiserfs, sysv, ubifs, udf, ufs, vboxsf) is to give
> > them a writepages, modelled on iomap_writepages(). Seems that adding
> > a block_writepages() might be a useful thing for me to do?
>
> Hmm, gfs2 does have gfs2_writepages() and gfs2_jdata_writepages()
> functions, so it should probably be fine.
Ah, it's gfs2_aspace_writepage which doesn't have a writepages
counterpart. I haven't looked at it to understand why it's needed.
(gfs2_meta_aops and gfs2_rgrp_aops)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-10 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-19 4:13 [Cluster-devel] remove iomap_writepage v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 4:13 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/4] gfs2: stop using generic_writepages in gfs2_ail1_start_one Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-18 21:22 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2023-01-19 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 4:13 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/4] gfs2: remove ->writepage Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 4:13 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 3/4] zonefs: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 6:56 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-07-19 4:13 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 4/4] iomap: remove iomap_writepage Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 6:56 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-07-22 17:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-28 11:10 ` [Cluster-devel] remove iomap_writepage v2 Jan Kara
2022-07-28 14:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-28 22:48 ` Dave Chinner
2022-07-28 23:26 ` Yang Shi
2022-07-29 9:22 ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-29 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-01 15:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-08-10 20:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-10 21:32 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2022-08-10 23:17 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-08-11 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvQ8gwsKZlOH6mlP@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).