From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 02:51:07 +0100
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v2 13/14] ext2: replace bh_submit_read()
 helper with bh_read_locked()
In-Reply-To: <3fdab5fd-1efa-9668-da5c-889e9bfa1524@huawei.com>
References: <20220901133505.2510834-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
 <20220901133505.2510834-14-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
 <YxFOqimAyJNxuPM9@ZenIV>
 <3fdab5fd-1efa-9668-da5c-889e9bfa1524@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <YxFhi1iJ2cFfKi04@ZenIV>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 09:32:53AM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> On 2022/9/2 8:30, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:35:04PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> >> bh_submit_read() and the uptodate check logic in bh_uptodate_or_lock()
> >> has been integrated in bh_read() helper, so switch to use it directly.
> > 
> > s/bh_read_locked/bh_read/ in the summary?
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I don't get your question, I have already replace bh_read_locked()
> with bh_read() in the commit message, there is no bh_read_locked in the whole
> patch. Am I missing something?

Take a look at the subject ;-)