From: Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] dlm: enhancing dlm_controld (pcmk) to be able to handle redundant rings
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:43:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b80f82d20910150043j29d5b149o9c50273c357e8d48@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8c992a30910142234u71c10551je59009165bfce4b2@mail.gmail.com>
Looks good to me :-)
Although it might be nice to have the automated detection in place too.
Less things for the admin to get wrong. What do you think Dave?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:17 AM, David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 06:50:56PM +0800, Jiaju Zhang wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Since there is no proper way to enable SCTP when using pacemaker stack,
>> > this patch is to auto-enabled SCTP when redundant rings have been
>> > configured
>> > in corosync.
>> > Review and comments are welcome :)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could we just make it a command line option? ?Is it important to turn on
>> automatically?
>>
>
> Yes, making it a command line option also works fine and it is simpler than
> that patch. Attached is a new patch which adding a command line option, I'll
> be very appreciated for your review and comments.
>
> The reason I wanted to turn on SCTP automatically is that it might have a
> little better usability since the user won't care the detail "redundant
> rings need SCTP to be configured" and even if the user hasn't read the
> manual very carefully and hasn't turn on SCTP in command line, the software
> will also help him to do this.
> That was my original thought, I don't know which one is better at that time.
>
> Thanks again for your review of the new patch :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-15 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-14 10:50 [Cluster-devel] [RFC PATCH] dlm: enhancing dlm_controld (pcmk) to be able to handle redundant rings Jiaju Zhang
2009-10-14 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Jiaju Zhang
2009-10-14 18:17 ` David Teigland
2009-10-15 5:34 ` Jiaju Zhang
2009-10-15 7:43 ` Andrew Beekhof [this message]
2009-10-15 14:51 ` David Teigland
2009-10-15 15:30 ` Andrew Beekhof
2009-10-15 16:07 ` Jiaju Zhang
2009-10-16 10:17 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-23 10:38 jjzhang
2009-10-23 13:05 ` Andrew Beekhof
2009-10-23 13:23 ` Jiaju Zhang
2009-10-23 13:34 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2009-10-23 17:55 ` David Teigland
2009-10-23 19:18 ` Steven Dake
2009-10-23 20:51 ` David Teigland
2009-10-26 10:44 ` Jiaju Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b80f82d20910150043j29d5b149o9c50273c357e8d48@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andrew@beekhof.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).