cluster-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 01/79] fs: add ctime accessors infrastructure
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:48:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c376703f26442b3310f173219c37c7b7ae4fe61b.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e513d856-3a6f-3a32-40fe-6c728e7b5ec8@talpey.com>

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 14:19 -0400, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 6/21/2023 2:01 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 13:29 -0400, Tom Talpey wrote:
> > > On 6/21/2023 10:45 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > struct timespec64 has unused bits in the tv_nsec field that can be used
> > > > for other purposes. In future patches, we're going to change how the
> > > > inode->i_ctime is accessed in certain inodes in order to make use of
> > > > them. In order to do that safely though, we'll need to eradicate raw
> > > > accesses of the inode->i_ctime field from the kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > Add new accessor functions for the ctime that we can use to replace them.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >    fs/inode.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++
> > > >    include/linux/fs.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >    2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> > > > index d37fad91c8da..c005e7328fbb 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > > > @@ -2499,6 +2499,22 @@ struct timespec64 current_time(struct inode *inode)
> > > >    }
> > > >    EXPORT_SYMBOL(current_time);
> > > >    
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * inode_ctime_set_current - set the ctime to current_time
> > > > + * @inode: inode
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Set the inode->i_ctime to the current value for the inode. Returns
> > > > + * the current value that was assigned to i_ctime.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct timespec64 inode_ctime_set_current(struct inode *inode)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct timespec64 now = current_time(inode);
> > > > +
> > > > +	inode_set_ctime(inode, now);
> > > > +	return now;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_ctime_set_current);
> > > > +
> > > >    /**
> > > >     * in_group_or_capable - check whether caller is CAP_FSETID privileged
> > > >     * @idmap:	idmap of the mount @inode was found from
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > index 6867512907d6..9afb30606373 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > @@ -1474,7 +1474,58 @@ static inline bool fsuidgid_has_mapping(struct super_block *sb,
> > > >    	       kgid_has_mapping(fs_userns, kgid);
> > > >    }
> > > >    
> > > > -extern struct timespec64 current_time(struct inode *inode);
> > > > +struct timespec64 current_time(struct inode *inode);
> > > > +struct timespec64 inode_ctime_set_current(struct inode *inode);
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * inode_ctime_peek - fetch the current ctime from the inode
> > > > + * @inode: inode from which to fetch ctime
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Grab the current ctime from the inode and return it.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline struct timespec64 inode_ctime_peek(const struct inode *inode)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return inode->i_ctime;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * inode_ctime_set - set the ctime in the inode to the given value
> > > > + * @inode: inode in which to set the ctime
> > > > + * @ts: timespec value to set the ctime
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Set the ctime in @inode to @ts.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline struct timespec64 inode_ctime_set(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 ts)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	inode->i_ctime = ts;
> > > > +	return ts;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * inode_ctime_set_sec - set only the tv_sec field in the inode ctime
> > > 
> > > I'm curious about why you choose to split the tv_sec and tv_nsec
> > > set_ functions. Do any callers not set them both? Wouldn't a
> > > single call enable a more atomic behavior someday?
> > > 
> > >     inode_ctime_set_sec_nsec(struct inode *, time64_t, time64_t)
> > > 
> > > (or simply initialize a timespec64 and use inode_ctime_spec() )
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, quite a few places set the fields individually. For example, when
> > loading a value from disk that doesn't have sufficient granularity to
> > set the nsecs field to anything but 0.
> 
> Well, they still need to set the tv_nsec so they could just pass 0.
> But ok.
> 

Sure. The difficulty is in trying to do this in an automated way. For
instance, look at the hfsplus patch; it has separate assignments in
place already:

-       result->i_ctime.tv_sec = result->i_mtime.tv_sec = result->i_atime.tv_sec = local_to_gmt(dir->i_sb, le32_to_cpu(dee.creation_date));
-       result->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
+       inode_ctime_set_sec(result,
+                           result->i_mtime.tv_sec = result->i_atime.tv_sec = local_to_gmt(dir->i_sb, le32_to_cpu(dee.creation_date)));
+       inode_ctime_set_nsec(result, 0);

Granted the new code is pretty ugly, but it compiles!

Transforming that into what you're suggesting is a tougher proposition
to do with coccinelle. I didn't see a way to conditionally catch cases
like this, declare a new variable in the appropriate spot and then
transform two assignments (that may not be next to one another!) into a
single one.

Maybe it's possible, but my grasp of SMPL is not that great. The docs
and examples (including Kees' vey helpful ones!) cover fairly simple
changes well, but I didn't quite grasp how to do that complex an
evolution.

> > Could I have done it by declaring a local timespec64 variable and just
> > use the inode_ctime_set function in these places? Absolutely.
> > 
> > That's a bit more difficult to handle with coccinelle though. If someone
> > wants to suggest a way to do that without having to change all of these
> > call sites manually, then I'm open to redoing the set.
> > 
> > That might be better left for a later cleanup though.
> 
> Acked-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
> 

Many thanks!

> > > > + * @inode: inode in which to set the ctime
> > > > + * @sec:  value to set the tv_sec field
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Set the sec field in the ctime. Returns @sec.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline time64_t inode_ctime_set_sec(struct inode *inode, time64_t sec)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = sec;
> > > > +	return sec;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * inode_ctime_set_nsec - set only the tv_nsec field in the inode ctime
> > > > + * @inode: inode in which to set the ctime
> > > > + * @nsec:  value to set the tv_nsec field
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Set the nsec field in the ctime. Returns @nsec.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static inline long inode_ctime_set_nsec(struct inode *inode, long nsec)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = nsec;
> > > > +	return nsec;
> > > > +}
> > > >    
> > > >    /*
> > > >     * Snapshotting support.
> > 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-21 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-21 14:45 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/79] fs: new accessors for inode->i_ctime Jeff Layton
2023-06-21 14:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 01/79] fs: add ctime accessors infrastructure Jeff Layton
2023-06-21 16:34   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-21 17:29   ` Tom Talpey
2023-06-21 18:01     ` Jeff Layton
2023-06-21 18:19       ` Tom Talpey
2023-06-21 18:48         ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-06-22  0:46   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-22 10:14     ` Jeff Layton
2023-06-30 22:12   ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-07-12 15:31   ` Randy Dunlap
     [not found] ` <20230621144735.55953-1-jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-21 14:45   ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 34/79] gfs2: switch to new ctime accessors Jeff Layton
2023-06-21 14:49 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 79/79] fs: rename i_ctime field to __i_ctime Jeff Layton
2023-06-21 19:21 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/79] fs: new accessors for inode->i_ctime Steven Rostedt
2023-06-21 19:52   ` Jeff Layton
2023-06-23 12:41     ` Christian Brauner
2023-06-30 22:11   ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c376703f26442b3310f173219c37c7b7ae4fe61b.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).