From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rix Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 06:46:46 -0800 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot In-Reply-To: <20201122032304.GE4327@casper.infradead.org> References: <20201121165058.1644182-1-trix@redhat.com> <20201122032304.GE4327@casper.infradead.org> Message-ID: List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/21/20 7:23 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 08:50:58AM -0800, trix at redhat.com wrote: >> The fixer review is >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D91789 >> >> A run over allyesconfig for x86_64 finds 62 issues, 5 are false positives. >> The false positives are caused by macros passed to other macros and by >> some macro expansions that did not have an extra semicolon. >> >> This cleans up about 1,000 of the current 10,000 -Wextra-semi-stmt >> warnings in linux-next. > Are any of them not false-positives? It's all very well to enable > stricter warnings, but if they don't fix any bugs, they're just churn. > While enabling additional warnings may be a side effect of this effort the primary goal is to set up a cleaning robot. After that a refactoring robot. Tom