From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/2][v2] blk-plug: don't flush nested plug lists
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:50:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x498udzlkkx.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150408230203.GG15810@dastard> (Dave Chinner's message of "Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:02:03 +1000")
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:13PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> The way the on-stack plugging currently works, each nesting level
>> flushes its own list of I/Os. This can be less than optimal (read
>> awful) for certain workloads. For example, consider an application
>> that issues asynchronous O_DIRECT I/Os. It can send down a bunch of
>> I/Os together in a single io_submit call, only to have each of them
>> dispatched individually down in the bowels of the dirct I/O code.
>> The reason is that there are blk_plug-s instantiated both at the upper
>> call site in do_io_submit and down in do_direct_IO. The latter will
>> submit as little as 1 I/O at a time (if you have a small enough I/O
>> size) instead of performing the batching that the plugging
>> infrastructure is supposed to provide.
>
> I'm wondering what impact this will have on filesystem metadata IO
> that needs to be issued immediately. e.g. we are doing writeback, so
> there is a high level plug in place and we need to page in btree
> blocks to do extent allocation. We do readahead at this point,
> but it looks like this change will prevent the readahead from being
> issued by the unplug in xfs_buf_iosubmit().
I'm not ignoring you, Dave, I'm just doing some more investigation and
testing. It's taking longer than I had hoped.
-Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-10 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1428347694-17704-1-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1428347694-17704-2-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com>
2015-04-07 18:55 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/2][v2] blk-plug: don't flush nested plug lists Jeff Moyer
2015-04-08 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-08 23:02 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-09 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-10 21:50 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x498udzlkkx.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).