From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: knut.omang@oracle.com (Knut Omang) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:11:45 +0100 Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1, 2} via a wrapper program In-Reply-To: <1513443601.4647.36.camel@perches.com> References: <1513437684.4647.30.camel@perches.com> <1513441634.31439.34.camel@oracle.com> <1513443601.4647.36.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: <1513444305.31439.37.camel@oracle.com> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:00 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:27 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the > > > > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. > > > > > > This seems like a useful and reasonable series, thanks. > > > > thanks, appreciated, > > > > > Do please take Julia's grammar updates. > > > > will do, > > > > > How is this series to be applied? > > > > I am open for suggestions. > > > > Let's leave patch #3 out for now. > > > > It's safe to apply #1 (and #2) alone. > > I'd just as soon combine patch #1 and an updated > patch #2 into a single patch and get that applied > sooner than later. Ok, will do that. > > They don't break anything by getting into the RDMA or RDS subsystem > > without patch #1, alternatively they can go together with the set of cleanup patches I > > have prepared for each of RDMA and RDS after #1 is in. > > right. Thanks, Knut