From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:10:45 +0200 Subject: [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc16: Further fine-tuning for the build system? In-Reply-To: <20130426081434.GA3645@redhat.com> References: <51348708.1000005@users.sourceforge.net> <5134C06D.4070906@users.sourceforge.net> <5134C654.3050706@users.sourceforge.net> <5138B81B.2040100@users.sourceforge.net> <5138C95F.8010608@users.sourceforge.net> <5144D0F8.3040302@users.sourceforge.net> <20130426081434.GA3645@redhat.com> Message-ID: <517A4495.20406@users.sourceforge.net> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > [Since you asked me in private email to contribute to this discussion ...] I am trying to find more software developers and packagers who know the Autotools good enough. I hope that corresponding updates can be reviewed in a constructive way then. > I think you're being unreasonable asking the Coccinelle developers to > fix things, and hardly specifying what the problem is (from what I can > gather it's something to do with separated builds not working?). Are you used to conditions which should be considered for the topic "out-of-source builds / parallel build trees"? I pointed out some open issues to make the build configuration consistent again. https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2013-March/000220.html http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.coccinelle/3054 > In any case, supply patches, with clear explanations behind each one. I got responses from Julia that she is not in the mood for the integration of fixes for the current build setup so far. Regards, Markus