From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:10:40 +0100 Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH resent] ALSA: emu10k1: Deletion of unnecessary checks before three function calls In-Reply-To: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54567788.9060008@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <54578CE0.1090201@users.sourceforge.net> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > Your patch can't be applied cleanly due to your MUA breaking the > lines. Please fix your MUA setup, or use an attachment if it's > impossible, and resend the patch. Thanks for your feedback. Does this example show a conflict between long comments like "snd_emu10k1_ctl_private_free( ... *kctl)" after patch ranges and line length limitation for email eventually? > Also, try to align the subject line with the relevant commits. See > "git log sound/pci/emu10k1" I have attached my update suggestion with a slightly different commit title as before. Is this variant acceptable? Regards, Markus -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-ALSA-emu10k1-Deletion-of-unnecessary-checks-before-t.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2120 bytes Desc: not available URL: