From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:30:44 +0100
Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] fs-fat: Less function calls in
 fat_fill_super() after error detection
In-Reply-To: <20141201065221.GA4994@mwanda>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <5467B12C.4010602@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411152117540.2225@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54796B5E.5040707@users.sourceforge.net> <87sih22sn8.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1411291338530.2378@hadrien>
 <87lhmu2jl8.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20141201065221.GA4994@mwanda>
Message-ID: <547C89A4.40002@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> Mixing the error paths together it always creates confusion.
> I fix so many of these bugs...  We get a few new ones every week.

Would you like to get help here from any other automatic semantic
patch approaches?


> Meanwhile Markus's error labels are absolutely useless.  They give no
> indication of what going to the label does.

Which names would be better acceptable for you?

Regards,
Markus