From: francois.berenger@inria.fr (Francois Berenger)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] What is the spatch file for this change and the corresponding spatch command line invocation
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:00:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54803EE7.70203@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54803A20.2080207@inria.fr>
On 12/04/2014 11:40 AM, Francois Berenger wrote:
> On 12/04/2014 11:29 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Francois Berenger wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> What is the spatch command line you used and which version of
>>> coccinelle are
>>> you using?
>>>
>>> I tried this:
>>>
>>> # apply.spatch is your exact proposal
>>> spatch --sp-file apply.spatch test_before.c -o /dev/stdout
>>
>> spatch apply.spatch test_before.c
>>
>> See what happens if you add -debug to the argument list.
>
> # spatch -debug -sp apply.spatch test_before.c
> init_defs_builtins: /home/berenger/.opam/4.01.0/share/coccinelle/standard.h
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> processing semantic patch file: /tmp/sp-15933-b4165a.cocci
> with isos from: /home/berenger/.opam/4.01.0/share/coccinelle/standard.iso
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@
> @@
> * apply.spatch
>
> warning: line 3: should apply be a metavariable?
In my whole apply.spatch file, there is nothing named apply ...
I am puzzled.
> (ONCE) Expected tokens spatch apply
> Skipping:test_before.c
> Check duplication for 0 files
> @@
> @@
> * apply.spatch
>
>> julia
>>
>>>
>>> Then I see on stdout the exact same file than what's in test_before.c
>>>
>>> On 12/03/2014 07:13 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> @@
>>>> expression i;
>>>> @@
>>>>
>>>> for ( ; ;
>>>> - ++i
>>>> ) {
>>>> if (1) {
>>>> + ++i;
>>>> continue;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> julia
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Francois.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cocci mailing list
>>> Cocci at systeme.lip6.fr
>>> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>>>
>
--
Regards,
Francois.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-04 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 17:29 [Cocci] What is the spatch file for this change and the corresponding spatch command line invocation Francois Berenger
2014-12-03 17:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-12-04 12:49 ` Francois Berenger
2014-12-04 12:56 ` Julia Lawall
2014-12-04 13:00 ` Francois Berenger
2014-12-04 17:31 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-12-04 14:31 ` Francois Berenger
2014-12-03 18:13 ` Julia Lawall
2014-12-04 10:17 ` Francois Berenger
2014-12-04 10:29 ` Julia Lawall
2014-12-04 10:40 ` Francois Berenger
2014-12-04 11:00 ` Francois Berenger [this message]
2014-12-04 11:22 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54803EE7.70203@inria.fr \
--to=francois.berenger@inria.fr \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox