From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] Fine-tuning for the processing of function name lists?
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:04:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C32335.8090802@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508051948060.2039@localhost6.localdomain6>
> It should be much better for the understandability of your code,
> for the maintainability of your code, and for the speed of processing
> your code to say
>
> identifier allocation = {function1, function2, function3, function4, ...};
Function names from various application programming interfaces follow
a few naming patterns.
Can SmPL scripts benefit from the fact that such identifiers contain
a couple of identical name components?
Regards,
Markus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 9:00 [Cocci] Finding unstored return values with SmPL SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-15 10:30 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-18 11:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-18 11:52 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-18 12:32 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-18 12:52 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-18 13:36 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-18 19:57 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-19 13:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-18 20:09 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-19 12:54 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-19 13:06 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-19 14:42 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-19 16:21 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-19 18:48 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-19 18:49 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-20 11:31 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-20 11:37 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-20 12:55 ` [Cocci] Finding designated initialisers " SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-20 13:27 ` [Cocci] Finding unstored return values " SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-20 16:28 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-20 20:23 ` [Cocci] Finding designated initialisers " SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-20 20:38 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-21 5:47 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-08-08 8:05 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-08-08 8:25 ` Julia Lawall
2015-08-08 8:41 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-08-08 11:40 ` Julia Lawall
2015-08-08 11:58 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-08-08 12:10 ` Julia Lawall
2015-08-08 12:56 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-22 17:42 ` [Cocci] Finding unstored return values " SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-22 17:44 ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-23 5:20 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-07-23 5:26 ` Julia Lawall
2015-08-05 11:00 ` SF Markus Elfring
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508051434540.2198@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <55C2229E.7030409@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508051652140.2198@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <55C2280A.6000204@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508051718110.2198@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <55C2328C.5020405@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508051948060.2039@localhost6.localdomain6>
2015-08-06 9:04 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C32335.8090802@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox