From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] Searching function implementations with variable declarations and statements?
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 14:42:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5da0fab5-ebbd-491b-84b1-69db7cec524e@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd958cff-a9bb-4f6e-8305-e5a09375ccc6@web.de>
> Should any diff output be produced accordingly?
Would you occasionally really find a source code search approach like the following
more appropriate?
Another SmPL script example:
@display3@
statement s;
identifier i;
type t;
@@
t i;
<+...
*s
...+>
Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Linux/next-analyses> time /usr/bin/spatch --no-loops …/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/show_statements_after_variable_declaration2.cocci include/
…
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ usb_endpoint_maxp_mult(const struct usb_
…
@@ -723,17 +722,10 @@ usb_ss_max_streams(const struct usb_ss_e
…
real 0m0,243s
user 0m0,199s
sys 0m0,042s
Is there a need to reconsider the handling of curly brackets (for compound statements)?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 8:01 [cocci] Searching function implementations with more than a single return? Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 11:54 ` [cocci] Searching function implementations with variable declarations and statements? Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 12:09 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 12:26 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 12:29 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 12:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 12:42 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-07-01 13:41 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 13:55 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 14:01 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 13:01 ` [cocci] Searching function implementations with more than a single return? Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 13:40 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 13:50 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 13:59 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 14:06 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-01 15:17 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-01 18:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-02 9:11 ` [cocci] Search challenges for “statement lists”? Markus Elfring
2025-07-03 10:00 ` [cocci] Using statement list combinations? Markus Elfring
2025-07-03 10:23 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-03 10:28 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-03 11:54 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-03 13:25 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5da0fab5-ebbd-491b-84b1-69db7cec524e@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox