From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicstange@gmail.com (Nicolai Stange) Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 21:03:55 +0100 Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races In-Reply-To: <20160306135430.GA17315@kroah.com> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Sun, 6 Mar 2016 05:54:30 -0800") References: <8737sjo7qa.fsf@gmail.com> <20160305212613.GA29738@kroah.com> <87egbn3gxb.fsf@gmail.com> <20160306135430.GA17315@kroah.com> Message-ID: <87a8mb2x1w.fsf@gmail.com> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote: >> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: >> >> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote: >> >> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle >> >> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own >> >> patch [4/8]. >> >> >> >> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any >> >> review yet. >> > >> > Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree, >> > let's see what breaks in linux-next now :) >> >> Great, thank you! >> >> Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've >> sent v5 in order to correct this. >> >> In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me >> know and I'll send two fixup patches instead. > > What do the fixup patches look like? That might be easier to take if > they aren't really major issues (one was a documentation issue, which > isn't a big deal...) I sent the two fixup patches as a proposal in a series of their own: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1457294345-4588-1-git-send-email-nicstange at gmail.com Thank you! Nicolai