Re: [cocci] spatch #include statements and include search path

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>>
>> I want to use a non-trivial match rule in multiple other rules, in
>> multiple .cocci files. I'm trying put the match rule in a separate file,
>> and #include that in the other files, to avoid duplication. (I'm
>> referring to the "include_cocci ::= #include string" usage of #include,
>> not transformations.)
>>
>> It works when the current working directory is the same as the file to
>> be included, but I seem to be unable to make it work from another
>> directory.
>>
>> It doesn't matter if the .cocci files are all in the same directory or
>> not, it doesn't seem to matter what I pass as -I to spatch on the
>> command-line. I see #include mentioned in the SmPL Grammar as well as
>> some tutorials, but I can't find any proper, working examples for it.
>>
>> How is the #include and the search path supposed to work? There seems to
>> be some conflation in the documentation about include_cocci in .cocci
>> and #includes in the .c files.
>>
>> Specifically, I'm running spatch in my kernel repo, and I keep the
>> .cocci files in a separate directory outside the kernel repo.
>
> I don't think there is any search path for .cocci files.

Oh, so it's always relative to the current working directory? That's a
bit of a bummer.

Thanks, though.

BR,
Jani.


>
> I see an example in tests/gadget_soa_defs.cocci that contains
>
> #include "tests/gadget_match.cocci"
>
> There was a problem about the files coming in the wrong order in the case
> of multiple included files.  I've pushed the recent changes out to github
> just now, so that fix should be there.
>
> julia

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel