public inbox for cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: julia.lawall@lip6.fr (Julia Lawall)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] Two identical declarer macros handled differently
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:13:42 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1301152213150.1981@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+MoWDq10KzZ-ogDpT1G4NTbUv5xQ8NYysrTqLfpqxkYASAQQw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:

> There is macro definition at:
> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h#L656
>
> #define D1(x) MACROSTATEMENT

I am sure that this is the problem.  We should really not have such
definitions.

julia

>
> That may be related to this issue. Note the spatch message:
> init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/share/coccinelle/standard.h
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
> <peter.senna@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi H?kon L?vdal,
> >
> > I do not know why, but the problem disappeared when I changed the "D1" name.
> >
> > $ more test.c test.cocci
> > ::::::::::::::
> > test.c
> > ::::::::::::::
> > static void foo(void *arg)
> > {
> > }
> > DD1(foo, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> >
> > static void bar(void *arg)
> > {
> > }
> > DD2(bar, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> >
> > ::::::::::::::
> > test.cocci
> > ::::::::::::::
> > @r@
> > declarer name DD1;
> > declarer name DD2;
> > expression E1, E2, E3, E4, E5;
> > @@
> >         DD1(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> >
> > @script:python@
> > e1 << r.E1;
> > e2 << r.E2;
> > e3 << r.E3;
> > e4 << r.E4;
> > e5 << r.E5;
> > @@
> > print "MATCH: 1: %s, 2: %s, 3: %s, 4: %s, 5: %s" % (e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> >
> > $ spatch /tmp/test.c /tmp/test.cocci
> > init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/share/coccinelle/standard.h
> > HANDLING: /tmp/test.c
> > MATCH: 1: foo, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0
> >
> > Can you reproduce this?
> >
> > []'s
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:14 PM, H?kon L?vdal <hlovdal@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi list. I started writing a script to be a grep for a declarer macro and
> >> print its arguments. For one of the source files however, it produced
> >> a false positive by printing arguments for another declarer macro as
> >> well. Investigating this, I found the following which I think is at
> >> least related, if not the same issue.
> >>
> >> With the following two identical D1 and D2 macros, coccinelle fails to
> >> handle D1.
> >>
> >> $ more declarer_test.c declarer_test-d2.cocci
> >> ::::::::::::::
> >> declarer_test.c
> >> ::::::::::::::
> >>
> >> static void foo(void *arg)
> >> {
> >> }
> >> D1(foo, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> >>
> >> static void bar(void *arg)
> >> {
> >> }
> >> D2(bar, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> >>
> >> ::::::::::::::
> >> declarer_test-d2.cocci
> >> ::::::::::::::
> >> @r@
> >> declarer name D1;
> >> declarer name D2;
> >> expression E1, E2, E3, E4, E5;
> >> @@
> >>         D2(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> >>
> >> @script:python@
> >> e1 << r.E1;
> >> e2 << r.E2;
> >> e3 << r.E3;
> >> e4 << r.E4;
> >> e5 << r.E5;
> >> @@
> >> print "MATCH: 1: %s, 2: %s, 3: %s, 4: %s, 5: %s" % (e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> >>
> >> $ spatch --sp-file declarer_test-d2.cocci declarer_test.c
> >> init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h
> >> HANDLING: declarer_test.c
> >> MATCH: 1: bar, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0
> >> $ diff declarer_test-d*
> >> 6c6
> >> <       D1(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> >> ---
> >>>       D2(E1, E2, E3, E4, E5);
> >> $ spatch --sp-file declarer_test-d1.cocci declarer_test.c
> >> init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h
> >> HANDLING: declarer_test.c
> >> $
> >>
> >>
> >> So when trying to print D2 it succeeds, but it fails for D1.
> >> Am I doing something wrong here?
> >>
> >> BR H?kon L?vdal
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cocci mailing list
> >> Cocci at systeme.lip6.fr
> >> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Peter
>
>
>
> --
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Cocci mailing list
> Cocci at systeme.lip6.fr
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>

      reply	other threads:[~2013-01-15 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-15 16:14 [Cocci] Two identical declarer macros handled differently Håkon Løvdal
2013-01-15 16:43 ` Peter Senna Tschudin
2013-01-15 16:59   ` Peter Senna Tschudin
2013-01-15 21:13     ` Julia Lawall [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1301152213150.1981@hadrien \
    --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox